Translate this page into:
Identification of Cardiac and Aortic Injuries in Trauma with Multi-detector Computed Tomography
Address for correspondence: Dr. Navneet Singh, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, AB-204, 2075 Bayview Ave, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada. E-mail: navneet.singh@utoronto.ca
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
This article was originally published by Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.
Abstract
Blunt and penetrating cardiovascular (CV) injuries are associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Rapid detection of these injuries in trauma is critical for patient survival. The advent of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) has led to increased detection of CV injuries during rapid comprehensive scanning of stabilized major trauma patients. MDCT has the ability to acquire images with a higher temporal and spatial resolution, as well as the capability to create multiplanar reformats. This pictorial review illustrates several common and life-threatening traumatic CV injuries from a regional trauma center.
Keywords
Aortic injuries
cardiovascular
multi-detector CT
trauma
INTRODUCTION
Blunt and penetrating cardiovascular (CV) injuries are associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Rapid detection in a trauma patient may improve survival. Multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) has increased the recognition of CV injuries in imaging of major trauma patients. MDCT has improved temporal and spatial resolution of images, allowing for improved quality of images and multiplanar reformats (MPRs) in a poly-trauma patient.[1] This pictorial review of traumatic cardiac and vascular injuries presents cases from a regional trauma center.
CARDIAC INJURIES
CV injuries are the second most common cause of traumatic death after central nervous system injuries and can be caused by penetrating or blunt trauma.[12] Penetrating injuries to the heart are lethal and are associated with a survival rate of approximately 6%.[1] Blunt cardiac injuries are associated with mortality rates ranging from 41 to 89%.[3] Various mechanisms may be involved in blunt cardiac injuries, including deceleration, blast, concussive, direct, and indirect forces.[2] MDCT allows for evaluation of cardiac injuries with a high sensitivity for pneumopericardium, pericardial effusion, pericardial or myocardial lacerations, and cardiac luxation.[4]
Cardiac and pericardial injuries may be identified via evaluation of direct or indirect signs [Table 1]. Sternal fractures, acute pectus deformity, underlying mediastinal hematoma, or direct mass effect on the cardiac chambers may be suggestive of cardiac injury [Figure 1].
Hemopericardium and pneumopericardium are direct signs of a cardiac or pericardial injury. In the setting of trauma, pericardial effusions are usually presumed to be hemopericardium related to cardiac or pericardial injury until proven otherwise [Figures 2 and 3].[5] Pneumopericardium may be difficult to differentiate from pneumomediastinum or medial pneumothorax on plain films alone. MDCT more sensitively detects air in the pleural cavity, mediastinum, and pericardium [Figure 4].
Pericardial tears in a trauma patient may lead to cardiac herniation. Findings of pericardial tear on MDCT include cardiac axis deviation, focal pericardial discontinuity, “collar” sign of the herniated heart, or empty pericardial sac sign (air in the empty pleuropericardium due to cardiac dislocation into the hemithorax).[1]
Rapid accumulation of pericardial fluid can lead to cardiac tamponade, limiting the cardiac inflow and reducing the stroke volume.[6] Hemorrhagic pericardial fluid and distended central veins (inferior vena cava, superior vena cava, hepatic veins) with or without evidence of contrast reflux and periportal edema are CT features that suggest cardiac tamponade. Indirect signs of cardiac tamponade include a compressive deformity of cardiac chambers, especially the more compliant right-sided chambers [Figure 5]. The anterior surface of the heart is flattened with a reduction in the anteroposterior (AP) diameter, described as the “flattened heart sign.”[7] Right atrial pseudoaneurysm has been recently described in the literature as a rare manifestation of blunt injury to the chest.[8]
AORTIC AND OTHER VASCULAR INJURIES
Major causes of traumatic aortic injury include high-speed motor vehicle collisions, falls from a height, pedestrian–automobile collisions, and crush injuries.[9] The morbidity and mortality from aortic injury is high and is immediately lethal in 80–90% of cases.[9] Aortic and vascular injury has been postulated to be a result of various potential mechanisms including rapid deceleration, shearing forces, and increased intravascular pressure caused by compression or the “osseous pinch” representing aortic compression between the anterior chest wall and the thoracic spine.[9] The most common site of aortic injury is at the aortic isthmus, followed by the ascending aorta, the descending aorta, and the aortic arch.[9] MPRs in different planes and three-dimensional volume-rendered images may improve the visualization of traumatic aortic injuries, and may be helpful to the vascular surgeon or interventional radiologist for planning treatment.
Imaging findings in acute traumatic aortic injuries have been classified as direct and indirect signs [Table 2]. Direct signs of traumatic aortic injury include pseudoaneurysm [Figure 6], intimal tear/flap or dissection [Figures 7 and 8], intraluminal mural thrombus [Figure 9], abrupt change in the caliber of aorta (pseudocoarctation), or active contrast extravasation.[10] Indirect signs may consist of mediastinal hematoma, indistinct mediastinal fat planes, peri-aortic hematoma [Figures 10 and 11], retrocrural hematoma, or a small caliber aorta. Mediastinal hematoma is a non-specific finding that can be associated with mediastinal venous injuries, in which case the fat plane between the hematoma and aorta is typically maintained.[9]
Minimal aortic injury usually involves the intima and accounts for 10% of patients with traumatic aortic injury [Figures 9 and 12].[9] Mimickers of traumatic aortic injury on MDCT may be either anatomic or technical and are reviewed elsewhere [Table 3].[9]
INTERVENTION
Traditionally, traumatic aortic injuries were repaired via an open approach. However, the majority of aortic injuries can now be treated with stent grafts. Meta-analyses have shown a decrease in postoperative mortality, ischemic spinal cord complications, and stroke.[11] The endovascular approach is minimally invasive and patients do not require systemic heparinization, which is particularly important because the patients often have multiple other significant injuries.[11] MDCT is also useful for planning endovascular procedures [Figure 13].
CONCLUSION
MDCT plays a key role in identifying and directing the management of CV injuries in major trauma patients.
Financial support and sponsorship
NS is supported by the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR FRN 120988) and the Radiology Society of North America Research and Education Foundation (#RR1561). AZ is supported by the Radiology Society of North Research and Education Foundation Scholar Grant (RSCH1329).
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Available FREE in open access from: http://www.clinicalimagingscience.org/text.asp?2015/5/1/48/163992
REFERENCES
- Blunt cardiac rupture. The Emanuel Trauma Center experience. Arch Surg. 1995;130:852-7.
- [Google Scholar]
- Imaging of acute thoracic injury: The advent of MDCT screening. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2005;26:305-31.
- [Google Scholar]
- Role of imaging in penetrating and blunt traumatic injury to the heart. Radiographics. 2011;31:E101-15.
- [Google Scholar]
- Pictorial review: Computed tomography features of cardiovascular emergencies and associated imminent decompensation. Emerg Radiol. 2011;18:127-38.
- [Google Scholar]
- Tension pericardial collections: Sign of ‘flattened heart’ in CT. Eur J Radiol. 1996;23:250-2.
- [Google Scholar]
- Acute traumatic aortic injury: Imaging evaluation and management. Radiology. 2008;248:748-62.
- [Google Scholar]
- Acute aortic syndrome and blunt traumatic aortic injury: Pictorial review of MDCT imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2010;74:24-39.
- [Google Scholar]
- Reduced mortality, paraplegia, and stroke with stent graft repair of blunt aortic transections: A modern meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:671-5.
- [Google Scholar]