Translate this page into:
Comparing MRI and arthroscopic appearances of common knee pathologies: A pictorial review
*Corresponding author: Nikhil N. Patel, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States. nnp20@med.miami.edu
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Lamour RJ, Patel NN, Harris GB, England JS, Lesniak BP, Kaplan LD, Jose J. Comparing MRI and arthroscopic appearances of common knee pathologies: A pictorial review. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2024;14:15. doi: 10.25259/JCIS_98_2023
Abstract
Knee pathology, including anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears, meniscal tears, articular cartilage lesions, and intra-articular masses or cysts are common clinical entities treated by orthopedic surgeons with arthroscopic surgery. Preoperatively, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is now standard in confirming knee pathology, particularly detecting pathology less evident with history and physical examination alone. The radiologist’s MRI interpretation becomes essential in evaluating intra-articular knee structures. Typically, the radiologist that interprets the MRI does not have the opportunity to view the same pathology arthroscopically. Thus, the purpose of this article is to illustratively reconcile what the orthopedic surgeon sees arthroscopically with what the radiologist sees on magnetic resonance imaging when viewing the same pathology. Correlating virtual and actual images can help better understand pathology, resulting in more accurate MRI interpretations. In this article, we present and review a series of MR and correlating arthroscopic images of ACL tears, meniscal tears, chondral lesions, and intra-articular masses and cysts. Short teaching points are included to highlight the importance of radiological signs and pathological MRI appearance with significant clinical and arthroscopic findings.
Keywords
Arthroscopy
Knee pathology
Orthopedic surgeons
Radiologists
Magnetic resonance imaging
INTRODUCTION
In this article, we present MRI alongside the respective arthroscopic knee images to better correlate radiological findings with arthroscopic knee findings. Arthroscopy is a widely used, non-invasive method used to directly visualize and repair pathologies within the joint capsule. Knee arthroscopy specifically involves the creation of several percutaneous incisions at various locations surrounding the joint to allow for the insertion of the arthroscope and arthroscopic instrumentation. The arthroscope enables real-time visualization of the internal structures of the knee on a monitor, guiding the surgeon in addressing identified issues through tissue repair or resection. Noteworthy, attributes of knee arthroscopy include its minimally invasive nature, abbreviated post-operative recovery period relative to conventional open surgery approaches, and reduced susceptibility to complications such as infection or hemorrhage.[1,2] The following series of cases will cover arthroscopic and MR images of various knee pathologies and complications to bring significant findings to the radiologist.
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) pathology
The ACL tear is the most common ligament injury in the body that is treated operatively. However, the true incidence of ACL injuries is difficult to assess because some injuries still need to be diagnosed.[3,4] The incidence of ACL reconstructions has been studied and shown to be significantly increasing.[5] Estimated rates of reconstructions in the United States range from 60,000 to 175,000,123) An epidemiological study of ACL reconstructions identified an increase from 6178 in 1997 to 7507 in 2006 in New York State alone.[5] This increasing volume of ACL reconstructions has made magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) an invaluable tool for accurately diagnosing various degrees of ACL injury for pre-operative evaluation.
Case 1: Partial ACL rupture
Teaching point: Descriptions of partial ACL tears vary from bleeding at the femoral origin to complete rupture of the anteromedial (AM) or posterolateral (PL) bundle.[6] This variability in the degree of ligament disruption makes the definitive diagnosis of partial ACL tear very difficult, even with MRI.[6-9] The variable MRI appearance of partial ACL rupture results in low sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis, with reported 55% of sensitivity and 75% of specificity when using primary MRI signs of partial ACL tear.[10] Therefore, arthroscopy is used in combination with history, physical examination, and MRI to unequivocally diagnose, in the setting of a partial ACL tear, a functionally ACL deficient knee, and develop an appropriate treatment plan [Figure 1].[4,6,9]
Case 2: ACL high-grade partial rupture of quadrupled hamstrings autograft
Case 3: Complete ACL rupture
Case 4: Complete ACL rupture
Case 5: Acute ACL rupture
Teaching point: The acutely disrupted ACL commonly presents with associated characteristic injuries.[7] Hemorrhagic effusion, “coup-contrecoup” bone bruising, and “kissing” bone contusions from the pivot shift or hyperextension mechanism are some signs detected radiologically.[7,11,12] It is important for radiologists to make the distinction between acute and chronic tears. ACL reconstruction in the acute setting (1–3 weeks) can lead to arthrofibrosis and permanent loss of knee motion in some patients. The radiologist can further improve MR interpretation of ACL injuries by including findings such as anterior tibial translation, uncovering of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus, and buckling of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). These particular findings are important in diagnosing an unstable ACL tear [Figure 6].[5,13-15]
Case 6: ACL ganglion cyst
Teaching point: ACL ganglion cysts are rare and currently of unknown etiology.[16-19] It is believed that they may develop from a congenital abnormality, previous injury, mucoid deterioration, or proliferation of pluripotential mesenchymal stem cells.[16-18] The relevance of ACL ganglion cysts is a factor when they become symptomatic, particularly with chronic knee pain, mechanical symptoms, limited range of motion, or instability.[18] When interpreting an MRI of this lesion, a broad differential diagnosis must be formed because a para-ligamentous or intra-ligamentous ganglion cyst can be mistaken for a tear [Figure 7].[7,15-18]
Case 7: Cyclops lesion
Teaching point: The cyclops lesion is a type of localized arthrofibrosis in the form of a fibrous nodule found at the anterior intercondylar notch.[20-23] It typically forms at the tibial insertion of the reconstructed ACL graft resulting in a mechanical block to extension.[7,21] The etiology is unknown, but several theories explaining its formation are described. Repetitive trauma of graft against bone from anterior graft placement resulting in impingement and graft hypertrophy with fibrous proliferation is a reported explanation.[22,23] An undebrided ACL stump and poorly debrided drilling debris of the tibial tunnel could also cause fibrous nodular development.[22,23] Arthroscopically assisted debridement is the accepted treatment of symptomatic patients [Figure 8].[7,20,21,23]
Case 8: Normal ACL (AM and PL bundles)
Teaching point: It is well established that there are two distinct bundles of the ACL, anteriomedial (AM), and posterolateral (PL), with separate femoral and tibial attachment sites.[23-27] The bundles are named by their relative insertional positioning at the ACL footprint of the tibia.[24] Using the clock face over the frontal view of the knee, AM and PL bundles are reported to originate on the posterior part of the medial wall of the lateral femoral condyle at the 10:30/1:30 (left/right knee) and 9:30/2:30 (left/right knee) positions, respectively. Although they have different rupture patterns, with the AM bundle commonly failing at the femoral origin and the PL bundle rupturing at the mid-substance or tibial insertion,[26] the normal separation between the bundles should not be mistaken for a tear on MRI [Figure 9].[23,25]
Case 9: Tibial eminence avulsion fracture, Meyers and McKeever type III
Teaching point: Tibial intercondylar eminence fractures are most commonly seen in the pediatric population aged 8–14.[5,7,26,28] Similar to adults, a non-contact pivot shift mechanism of injury causes avulsion fracture of the tibia intercondylar eminence and resultant compromised ACL function.[28] The following modified Meyers and McKeever classification describes the varying degree of injury that can occur and guides treatment. Type I, non-displaced; Type II, displaced anteriorly with an intact posterior cortical hinge; Type III, completely displaced and void of all bony contact; and Type IV, comminuted.[28] This injury can be identified on initial radiographic workup, but MRI is important to determine the extent of damage and comminution [Figure 10].
Intra-articular cysts and tumors
Case 10: Parameniscal cyst of the anterior lateral meniscus
Teaching point: Radiological and arthroscopic studies have confirmed that parameniscal cysts arise from synovial fluid extrusion through underlying meniscal tears.[29-31] A Horizontal cleavage tear is the most commonly described tear pattern associated with cyst formation.[29-31] The goal of treatment is to treat the tear with either meniscal debridement or repair and cyst decompression.[30,31] Of note, there is a reported high frequency (>95%) of medial parameniscal cysts with medial meniscus tears and lateral parameniscal cysts with tears of the body and posterior horn of the lateral meniscus.[29] More recent literature found that 36% of underlying meniscal tears were absent, with cysts adjacent to the anterior horn or 1/3 of the lateral meniscus.[29] If parameniscal cysts exist anterior to the lateral meniscus with no identifiable meniscal tear, other causes should be considered, such as Hoffa fat pad ganglia, intermeniscal ligament tears, or degeneration [Figures 11 and 12].[29]
Case 11: Focal pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS)
Teaching point: PVNS is a proliferative disease of synovial joints but most commonly affects the knee in young adults.[7] It occurs as a single nodule (focal), a cluster of synovial nodules, or diffuse, boggy proliferative synovitis.[5,7,30,32,33] Initially, diagnosis can be challenging because the most common clinical presentation in the knee is a painless or mildly painful effusion. The nodules can cause mechanical symptoms and mimic meniscal tears, loose bodies, or patellofemoral disorders.[7] PVNS also frequently involves the posterior compartment.[7] When evaluating a knee effusion with an insidious onset, the astute radiologist should be suspicious of PVNS because treatment is surgical.[7,32,33] Current recommendations favor arthroscopic synovectomy.[7,32,33] Lesions in the posterior compartment must be identified on MRI for appropriate preoperative planning, as nonstandard posterior arthroscopic portals are made to access the posterior knee joint and complete the synovectomy [Figure 13].
Case 12: Synovial chondromatosis
Teaching point: Synovial chondromatosis is a rare tumor-like disorder characterized by cartilaginous metaplasia of the intimal layer of the synovium, including synovial structures outside of the joint (i.e., tendon sheaths and bursa).[7,34,35] The cartilaginous nodules can detach from the synovium resulting in loose bodies that may undergo secondary calcification and ossification.[14] When viewed arthroscopically, the accumulated nodules resemble a “snowstorm” in the knee joint. Due to its high recurrence rate (>25%) after arthroscopic synovectomy, it is important for radiologists to identify among other benign synovial disorders that can mimic its MRI appearance, such as tumoral calcinosis and PVNS [Figures 14 and 15].[7,34-36]
Meniscal pathology
The following cases review fundamental MRI principles when interpreting various meniscal tears. Correlating arthroscopic images are included for added appreciation of the pathology present.
Case 13: Acute lateral meniscus retears, unstable
Teaching point: The altered meniscal anatomy can make diagnosing a retear in the postoperative meniscus challenging.[37,38] MR arthrography can increase the sensitivity of meniscal retear detection[7,37,38] but conventional MRI may still provide some utility. Even in a previously debrided or repaired meniscus, abrupt change in the contour of a postoperative meniscus should be met with reasonable suspicion for reinjury [Figure 16].[37]
Case 14: Displaced lateral meniscus undersurface flap tear
Teaching point: A meniscal flap tear is the result of a short-segment, horizontal meniscal tear with either superior or inferior displacement. MRI findings are subtle, but this tear pattern can be clinically significant, warranting arthroscopic resection. Careful examination of the triangular meniscal shape on sagittal images should be performed to detect abnormalities [Figure 17].
Case 15: Displaced, large medial meniscus horizontal tear
Teaching point: Flap tears of the meniscus can continue propagating without treatment and become large floating pieces in the joint, potentially causing mechanical symptoms.[7] Again, abrupt changes in the thickness of the meniscus suggest tears and detailed descriptions of the locations of torn fragments should be made to facilitate arthroscopically identification [Figure 18].[38]
Case 16: Acute radial tear of the lateral meniscus mid-body
Teaching point: Acute radial tear of the mid-body of the lateral meniscus is often a result of the pivot shift mechanism and is associated with acute ACL rupture.[7,39,40] This particular tear pattern has detrimental effects on the contact pressures experienced by the articular cartilage secondary to the disruption of the circumferential collagen fibers of the meniscus.[41] Identifying meniscal tears with concomitant ACL ruptures is important because if repairable, there is a greater healing potential of the meniscal repair due to the release of growth factors when drilling bone tunnels for ACL reconstruction [Figure 19].[7]
Case 17: Diagnosis: Lateral discoid meniscus, radial tear
Teaching point: Being able to see the meniscal body on three or more consecutive MR sagittal images is suggestive of discoid meniscus.[1]
Arthroscopically, a thick meniscal rim is present even after cauterization [Figures 20 and 21].
Case 18: Lateral meniscus anterior horn tear, degenerative
Case 19: Medial meniscus tear, bucket handle type
Chondral pathology
Case 20: Grade I chondral injury (Chondromalacia)
Teaching point: Swelling and softening of articular cartilage are much more prone to further damage and degradation. Commenting on areas of chondromalacia allows the arthroscopist to understand how fragile the articular surface is before surgery [Figure 24].
Case 21: Grade II and III chondral injury
Case 22: Grade IV chondral injury, femoral trochlea
Teaching point: Malalignment, ligamentous laxity, and location of full-thickness defects of cartilage are deciding factors in the surgical treatment of cartilage defects in the knee. Correction of alignment and/or ligamentous instability would precede any cartilage restorative procedures or be performed concomitantly.[7] Thus, it is important for radiologists to specify the location of high-grade lesions and other knee derangements for pre-operative planning [Figure 26].
Case 23: Chondral impaction fracture, lateral femoral condyle
Teaching point: Subchondral depression from a pivot shift injury is technically a fracture and should be treated as such. Findings may be subtle and can be mistaken for a bone bruise, but any depression or loss of the normal distal femoral contour should be appreciated and reported. Chondral impaction fractures should be treated with a period of non-weight bearing in addition to addressing potential concomitant injuries from the pivot shift mechanism, that is, ACL and meniscal tears [Figure 27].
CONCLUSION
It is essential for radiologists to become familiarized with the classic arthroscopic appearance of common knee pathologies so that the MRI reports can be more valuable to the referring orthopedic surgeon regarding preoperative planning and treatment discussions with the patients.
With an improved understanding of the arthroscopic appearance of commonly seen findings on MRI, radiologists will be able to paint orthopedic surgeons a more functional picture of what they should expect to see intraoperatively, enabling the orthopedic surgeon to formulate a more educated preoperative surgical approach to the pathology at hand and potentially improve surgical outcomes.
Ethical approval
The Institutional Review Board approval is not required.
Declaration of patient consent
Patient’s consent is not required as patients identity is not disclosed or compromised.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation
The authors confirm that they have used artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript or image creations.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
References
- Complications after arthroscopic knee surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:292-6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Update on the risks of complications after knee arthroscopy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19:179.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clinical practice. Anterior cruciate ligament tear. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2135-42.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cost effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;367:272-82.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligmaent Reconstruction: Trends, readmissions, and subsequent knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2321-28.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- A comprehensive review of partial anterior cruciate ligament tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:198-208.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Insall and Scott surgery of knee (4th ed). Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2006.
- [Google Scholar]
- Current concept of partial anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96(8 Suppl):S109-18.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament. Progression to complete ligament deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989;71:825-33.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diagnosis of partial tears of the anterior cructiate ligament of the knee: Value of the MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:893-7.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The phenomenon of “ligmentization”: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon. J Orthop Res. 1986;4:162-72.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- “Empty wall” and “vertical strut” signs of ACL insufficiency. Arthroscopy. 1989;5:137-40.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anterior cruciate ligament injury: MR imaging diagnosis and patterns of injury. Radiographics. 1992;12:901-15.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study of bone bruises associated with anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. Arthroscopy. 2001;17:445-9.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arthrofibrosis of the knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:682-94.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Intra-articular gnanglion cysts of the knee joint: A report of 85 cases and review of the literature. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthosc. 2004;12:123-9.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ganglion cysts of the anterior cruciate ligament: A case report and review of the literature. Arthroscopy. 1994;10:110-2.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Symptomatic Ganglion cyst within the substance of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy. 1995;11:612-5.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ganglion cysts of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy. 1994;10:574-5.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Intraligamentous ganglion cysts of the anterior cruciate ligament: MR findings with clinical and arthroscopic correlations. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996;20:80-4.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arthrofibrosis of the knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:682-94.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Localized anterior arthrofibrosis (Cyclops lesion) after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: MR imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:383-5.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cyclops syndrome: Loss of extension following intra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1990;6:171-8.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Current knowledge in the anatomy of the human anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:1075-84.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anterior cruciate ligament anatomy and function relating to anatomic reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:982-92.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Intraarticular rupture pattern of the ACL. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;454:48-53.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament with regards to its two bundles. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;454:35-47.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pediatric tibial eminence fractures: Evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop. 2010;18:395-405.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Association of parameniscal cysts with underlying meniscal tears as identified on MRI and arthroscopy. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:W180-6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arthroscopic treatment of meniscal cysts. Arthroscopy. 1993;9:591-5.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arthroscopic treatment of cysts of the lateral meniscus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75B:299-302.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pigmented villonodular synovitis in joints. J Surg Oncol. 2011;103:386-9.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arthroscopic treatment of pigmented villodular synovitis of the knee. Arthroscopy. 1999;15:613-7.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Synovial chondromatosis of four compartments of the knee: Medial and lateral tibiofemoral spaces, patellofemoral joint and proximal tibiofibular joint. Knee Surg Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:753-5.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Imaging of synovial chondromatosis with radiologicpathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2007;27:1465-88.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MR imaging of the postoperative meniscus of the knee. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2002;6:35-46.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MR diagnosis of recurrent tear in the knee: Value of intraarticular contrast material. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;161:821-5.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Inferiorly displaced flap tears of the medial meniscus: MR appearance and clinical significance. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:161-4.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meniscal repair for radial tear of the midbody of the lateral meniscus. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:2472-6.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Different patterns of meniscal tears in acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures and in chrronic ACL-deficient knees: Classification, staging and timing of treatment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1995;3:130-4.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]