Go Back
This abstract was viewed 81 times

Original research article


Transabdominal Ultrasonography in Symptomatic Choledocholithiasis – Usefulness in Settings with Limited Resources

Supun Lakmal De Silva1Ajith Aloka Pathirana2Thejana Kamil Wijerathne2Bawantha Dilshan Gamage2Buddhika Kemiya Dassanayake3Mohan Malith De Silva2
1Postgraduate Institute of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo 10, 2Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Gangodawila, Nugegoda, 3Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
Date of Submission: 17-Apr-2019, Date of Acceptance: 20-May-2019, Date of Web Publication: 28-Jun-2019.
Corresponding Author:
Corresponding Author

Supun Lakmal De Silva

E-mail: supun85@gmail.com

Corresponding Author:
Corresponding Author

Supun Lakmal De Silva

E-mail: supun85@gmail.com

DOI: 10.25259/JCIS-38-2019 Facebook Twitter Google Linkedin

ABSTRACT



Objective: Ultrasonography remains the initial imaging modality in the management of biliary disease. This study is designed to evaluate the accuracy of transabdominal ultrasonography in diagnosing biliary pathology in patients with choledocholithiasis.
Methods: This was a retrospective study of a continuous sample of patients over a period of 3 years ending in January 2016; these patients were referred for endoscopic management of choledocholithiasis to a tertiary care hospital in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Ultrasound reporting was carried out by different consultant radiologists at both the index and the referring hospitals. The findings of endoscopic retrograde cholangiograms were compared with the ultrasound scan (USS) results.
Results: A total of 247 patients were included in the study. USS was 97.4% accurate in detecting intrahepatic duct dilatation (IHDD). Stone counts and the location of stone(s) in the USSs correlated strongly with the number of stones delivered during endoscopic removal and their location in cholangiograms (p < 0.001). The difference in mean diameter of the common bile duct (CBD) of patients with choledochal cysts (CCs) (18.57 mm) and of patients without them (12.39 mm) is statistically significant (p < 0.001). At 14.5 mm, the negative predictive value for a CC is 99.02%.
Conclusion: Ultrasonography is a reliable tool in predicting IHDD, stone count, and the location of stones in the biliary tree, particularly in a resource-poor setting. A CBD diameter of 14.5 mm in transabdominal ultrasound scan can be used as a cutoff for predicting extrahepatic CC.
Keywords: Ultrasonography in choledocholithiasis, Intrahepatic duct dilatation, Choledochal cyst, Common bile duct

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.